On 9 Jun 2009 as I do recall,
Richard Porter wrote:
> On 8 Jun 2009 John-Mark Bell wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 10:46 +0100, Richard Porter wrote:
>
> >> I mean that you have decided not to implement target="_new" because
> >> you believe that it isn't valid html and therefore shouldn't be
> >> supported.
>
> > Er, no. There was a bug. It is now fixed.
>
> Aha, I see it is fixed in the latest release. Thanks for that. When I
> mentioned it in the past I was told it wasn't going to get done, as a
> result of which I've changed a lot of pages to "_blank".
So, should I report the use of "_new_window" as a bug in the website (it
is quite possibly a typo on a recently updated and rarely-used link) or
not...?
--
Harriet Bazley == Loyaulte me lie ==
Reality is for people who can't face science fiction.
