On 8 Jun 2009 John-Mark Bell wrote:

> On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 10:46 +0100, Richard Porter wrote:

>> I mean that you have decided not to implement target="_new" because
>> you believe that it isn't valid html and therefore shouldn't be
>> supported.

> Er, no. There was a bug. It is now fixed.

Aha, I see it is fixed in the latest release. Thanks for that. When I 
mentioned it in the past I was told it wasn't going to get done, as a 
result of which I've changed a lot of pages to "_blank".

Richard
-- 
 _
|_|. _   Richard Porter               http://www.minijem.plus.com/
|\_||_                                mailto:[email protected]
Disclaimer: Please imagine about 50 lines of pointless clutter.

Reply via email to