It is a suitable conflation, considering the reductive appropriation by Nazis 
of F. Nietzsche. 

> On Sep 11, 2018, at 4:43 PM, bronac ferran <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Happens all the time 
> "There are also red secrets in the world, actually, only reds.
> Notices about Filtered Results
> 
> 
>> On 11 September 2018 at 14:10, David Garcia 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Whoops
>> Sorry yes it should have read Hermann Nitsch
>> 
>>> On 11 Sep 2018, at 14:02, bronac ferran <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Has Hermann become Friedrich here? 
>>> Or is it vice versa? 
>>> 
>>>> On 11 September 2018 at 08:56, David Garcia 
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Yes thanks Florian- so interesting to read this mangling of Gramsci by 
>>>> Yiannopolous. The extraordinary images of him cavorting in a bath of 
>>>> pig’s blood in a scandalously naive (or simply cynical) NY Chelsea 
>>>> gallery, purportedly 
>>>> mourning the lives lost to Islamic fundementalism- he looked for all the 
>>>> world  like 
>>>> a "bargain basement" Herman Nietzsche. This plumbed new depths of 
>>>> shock/kitch (is 
>>>> that a genre there days- looking at Yiannopolous’s erstwhile friend Lucien 
>>>> Wintrich 
>>>> photo series Twinks for Trump its beginning to look that way). 
>>>> Actually this hides the more serious development that Yiannopolous’s 
>>>> tactics have 
>>>> re-purposed the venerable Camp sensibility which he cleverly connects with 
>>>> Lulz, as 
>>>> sharing the ability to be shocking whilst simultaneously using their 
>>>> respective modes 
>>>> as solvents to neutralize moral indignation. 
>>>> 
>>>> 1. A couple of asides at the end of last year Wolfgang Streeck wrote a very
>>>> interesting piece for London review of Books called ‘You Need a Gun’ which 
>>>> argued that Gramsci concept of hegemony could not be understood if it were 
>>>> seen 
>>>> to be coercion free- but that coercion takes many forms with violence as a 
>>>> background 
>>>> option always available if all else fails. Though there is much that there 
>>>> may be much 
>>>> that Bannon and the other Gramscian’s of the new American far right get 
>>>> wrong but this 
>>>> is one aspect they have understood quite well. 
>>>> 
>>>> 2. This is quite tenuous association but listening to your talk I thought 
>>>> of the English Marxist
>>>> philosopher Peter Dews’s book -The Idea of Evil- interrogates a certain 
>>>> bias in history 
>>>> and political thought that ‘people who are pessiistic about human nature 
>>>> tend to be 
>>>> right wing, while left wing thinkers tend to be optimistic about human 
>>>> nature (in Dews’s 
>>>> view naively so) in a recent interview Dews declared that he wanted to 
>>>> disrupt this 
>>>> alignment.. Whilst listening to your talk in Berlin I wondered if there 
>>>> was something like an 
>>>> exploration of the affective consequences of such a re-alignment in your 
>>>> talk and the questions 
>>>> that this might ask of us.
>>>> 
>>>> Best
>>>> 
>>>> David 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>    
>>>>> On 10 Sep 2018, at 23:58, Florian Cramer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks, David - as I said in the discussion in Berlin, Stewart and I 
>>>>> ended up
>>>>> in a weird place where we practically taught the "Alt-Right" its own 
>>>>> history.
>>>>> One shouldn't read too much into its grasp of Gramsci though. This is 
>>>>> what Milo
>>>>> Yiannopolous wrote about him in the original manuscript of his book
>>>>> 'Dangerous' (that Simon & Schuster ended up not publishing):
>>>>> And so, in the 1920s, the Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci decided that the
>>>>> time had come for a new form of revolution -- one based on culture, not
>>>>> class. According to Gramsci, the reason why the proletariat had failed to
>>>>> rise up was because old, conservative ideas like loyalty to one's country,
>>>>> family values, and religion held too much sway in working-class 
>>>>> communities.
>>>>> If that sounds familiar to Obama's comment about guns and religion, that's
>>>>> because it should. His line of thinking, as we shall see, is directly
>>>>> descended from the ideological tradition of Gramsci. Gramsci argued that 
>>>>> as a
>>>>> precursor to revolution, the old traditions of the west -- or the 
>>>>> 'cultural
>>>>> hegemony,' as he called it -- would have to be systematically broken 
>>>>> down. To
>>>>> do so, Gramsci argued that "proletarian" intellectuals should seek to
>>>>> challenge the dominance of traditionalism in education and the media, and
>>>>> create a new revolutionary culture. Gramsci's ideas would prove 
>>>>> phenomenally
>>>>> influential. If you've ever wondered why forced to take diversity or 
>>>>> gender
>>>>> studies courses at university, or why your professors all seem to hate
>>>>> western civilization ... Well ' ..new you knew who to blame Gramsci.
>>>>> (Because of the lawsuit, the manuscript is publicly available here:
>>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/bjc0n5dll244o2w/Milo%20Y%20book%20with%20edits.pdf?dl=0
>>>>> )
>>>>> -F
>>>>> --
>>>>> blog: https://pod.thing.org/people/13a6057015b90136f896525400cd8561
>>>>> bio: http://floriancramer.nl
>>>>> #  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
>>>>> #  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
>>>>> #  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
>>>>> #  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
>>>>> #  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]
>>>>> #  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> #  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
>>>> #  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
>>>> #  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
>>>> #  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
>>>> #  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]
>>>> #  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Bronaċ
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Bronaċ
> 
> 
> #  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
> #  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
> #  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
> #  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
> #  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]
> #  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:

Reply via email to