Is it more closely related to the “deep state” or to “deep pockets “? Both?

Best,

Michael via iPhone, so please ecuse misteaks.

> On Apr 23, 2021, at 7:09 PM, Ted Byfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 23 Apr 2021, at 19:11, Molly Hankwitz wrote:
> 
>> What is “Deep Humanities”?
> 
> This seems like your basic Silly Valley 'branding' proposal powerpoint, right 
> down to the gobsmacking conceit that what they're doing is 'deep,' which 
> implies that what everyone else has been doing — like for the last century or 
> two (or twenty) — is shallow. Without fail the opposite is true, but there 
> are the words, right there in front of you, and they say the opposite, so 
> reading things like this always involves a fleeting doubt about who's insane, 
> you or the authors.
> 
> The bullet points follow a formula, which is to toss out a potted definition 
> that might be at home in a catalog description for an intro-level undergrad 
> course, followed by an effort to make it relevant to tech bros. For example:
> 
>>> Culture: not as a stable set of practices to be manipulated or overcome, 
>>> but as a dynamic site of struggle for meaning; as a form of “artificial 
>>> intelligence” that enhances and extends human intelligence and capabilities.
> 
>>> Ethics: ethical ways of conceiving and connecting with the Other all its 
>>> planetary diversity; integrating ethics into STEM/STEM education, business, 
>>> politics, planning, and policy.
> 
>>> Language/communication – communication/language in human/non-human; human 
>>> cognition/intelligence as well as AI and machine learning, including 
>>> notions of context, common sense, and critical thinking.
> 
> I'm not *even* going to touch the one about "reality."
> 
>>> At its most profound, Deep Humanities aims to bring our cumulative 
>>> accumulated knowledges about the practice of being human to engage the 
>>> urgent issues of our times.
> 
> As opposed to all those shallow humanities. And, yes, I saw the thing about 
> "cumulative accumulated knowledges."
> 
> I don't think the authors are insane. I sympathize with how difficult it must 
> be to teach humanities in a setting like San Jose, where everything, 
> everywhere, in every moment radiates the boundless, inbred naive confidence 
> of tech wealth and power. Even very strong people would need to make serious 
> accommodations to survive. This initiative seems like a product of those 
> accommodations.
> 
> Cheers,
> Ted
> #  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
> #  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
> #  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
> #  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
> #  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]
> #  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:

Reply via email to