On 03/28/2011 09:07 AM, Niels Möller wrote: > Maybe it makes things simpler to stick to a single repository for > everything (like the current cvs repository)? Is there any compelling > reason why nettle must be a separate repository? (If I understand the > docs correctly, one could split off a nettle repository later, using > git-subtree split).
I'd personally like to work on nettle without dealing with the entire
source of lsh and the other components.
I suspect the same might be true of people who want to hack on the other
components, or on lsh itself.
If you want to encourage external participation, separate repositories
make more sense to me.
How do other folks on this list feel about the tradeoffs here?
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
