Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]> writes: > On 03/28/2011 03:17 AM, Niels Möller wrote: >> Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> hm, are you talking about making binary releases? or source releases? >> >> I'm talking about the source releases of lsh. > > I'm a software developer, a sysadmin, and a contributor to a distro > (debian). No matter which of those three hats i'm wearing, i *strongly* > prefer to have source releases broken out into separable components, > rather than one monolithic tarball. I prefer this for system > maintenance, for security, for clarity of API, and for ease of modification.
+1 As Nettle is looking to become more widely, it seems like a good time to make a separate repository for it. Lsh could just import the latest stable Nettle release, couldn't it? /Simon _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
