On 03/28/2011 07:47 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 03/28/2011 09:07 AM, Niels Möller wrote: >> Maybe it makes things simpler to stick to a single repository for >> everything (like the current cvs repository)? Is there any compelling >> reason why nettle must be a separate repository? (If I understand the >> docs correctly, one could split off a nettle repository later, using >> git-subtree split). > I'd personally like to work on nettle without dealing with the entire > source of lsh and the other components.
That is the case with me as well. Moreover requiring someone to checkout a different project to access nettle, just gives the impression that the library is not intended for general use, but is rather an internal library of that project. regards, Nikos _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
