[email protected] (Niels Möller) writes:

> Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> No, it is not a cryptographic hash function since it is not
>> collision-resistant.  Think of it as CRC or FNV.
>
> I'd like to understand better the properties of Salsa. As I see it, we
> have a complicated non-linear, but easily invertible, permutation on
> blocks of 64 bytes (or 512 bits). Call this function P(X). Then we
> construct a hash function
>
>   F(X) = X xor P(X)

There is no XOR in the Salsa20 core?

>> and scrypt does too.
>
> Reading the internet draft, it looks like it treats input and output as
> 64 bytes. I haven't read any other scrypt materials.

Yes, the draft treat it that way because the function appears to be
defined that way.  The scrypt paper does too
(<http://www.tarsnap.com/scrypt/scrypt.pdf>).

>> It seems scrypt doesn't little endian convert inputs but expects the
>> output uint32_t to be little endian converted though... I'll bring
>> this up with Colin.
>
> Please do, this needs to be sorted out.

I was mistaken, scrypt uses the uint32_t interface directly and (as
epxected) without any endian conversion.

>>> In nettle I currently don't use array types for function arguments.
>
>> I've always regarded it as something intended for humans.  I'm not sure
>> what a compiler could do with the information.  Perhaps it could be
>> useful for optimizations though.
>
> I tend to use pointer notation, because (1) it's what really happens,
> (2) it's shorter to write, and (3) because arrays may give a casual
> reader the impression that something more complicated happens. Neither
> is a very good reason, but for now I think we should stick to pointers
> for consistency within Nettle. If arrays notation is better, we should
> change that in all places where we pass arrays of constant size.

No problem, I've made this change locally.  Once we sort out the naming
issue I'll submit another patch.

/Simon
_______________________________________________
nettle-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs

Reply via email to