Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <[email protected]> writes: > On Sat, 2015-01-17 at 09:42 +0100, Niels Möller wrote: > >> I think I'd prefer to do it the other way around, with memxor-1.asm and >> memxor-2.asm both including x86_64/memxor.asm, just defining USE_SSE2 >> differently. With little actual code under fat/. Do you see any problem >> with that approach? > > No (but no idea how to implement it).
Pushed in now. > I realized that non-ifunc systems are desirable, or windows support goes > away. I couldn't make wrapper functions using macros. What I'm thinking > is a perl script which auto-generates the wrapper functions by reading > fat.c and the header files. What would you think of that? Let me give it a try using the C preprocessor first. Regards, /Niels -- Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid C0B98E26. Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance. _______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
