On തിങ്കള് 12 ഒക്ടോബര് 2009 09:25
, sankarshan wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Anivar Aravind
<[email protected]> wrote:
Some of the special interest groups we identified are also listed on same page
I took a quick look at the SIGs and, it appears that there is no group
for "content". By content, I indicate the umbrella term that covers
both creative content and, educational content ie. textbooks and the
like. Is there a need to have one or, should this be covered in an
overlapping fashion by the other SIGs ?
This is very close to what I was arguing regarding "foss for education".
I still think we should add one more item or even better include it in
the first point as "Promoting collaborative processes and foss tools in
building/sharing knowledge and culture" (could be worded differently).
This need not be restricted to just using foss tools.
I think we also missed one important item that was present in the
principles list
'Encouragement for student commitment and contribution to FOSS'
I suggest we add "Encouraging student commitment and contribution to
FOSS" as a point in the charter.
- Praveen
_______________________________________________
network mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
