On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Praveen Arimbrathodiyil
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On തിങ്കള്‍ 12 ഒക്ടോബര്‍ 2009 09:25
> , sankarshan wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Anivar Aravind
>> <[email protected]>  wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Some of the special interest groups we identified are also listed on same
>>> page
>>>
>>
>> I took a quick look at the SIGs and, it appears that there is no group
>> for "content". By content, I indicate the umbrella term that covers
>> both creative content and, educational content ie. textbooks and the
>> like. Is there a need to have one or, should this be covered in an
>> overlapping fashion by the other SIGs ?
>>
>>
>>
>
> This is very close to what I was arguing regarding "foss for education". I
> still think we should add one more item or even better include it in the
> first point as "Promoting collaborative processes and foss tools in
> building/sharing knowledge and culture" (could be worded differently). This
> need not be restricted to just using foss tools.
>
> I think we also missed one important item that was present in the principles
> list
>
> 'Encouragement for student commitment and contribution to FOSS'
>
> I suggest we add "Encouraging student commitment and contribution to FOSS"
> as a point in the charter.
>

This suites for a SIG

Anivar


-- 
"[It is not] possible to distinguish between 'numerical' and
'nonnumerical' algorithms, as if numbers were somehow different from
other kinds of precise information." - Donald Knuth
_______________________________________________
network mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in

Reply via email to