On Dec 11, 2009, at 12:10 PM, ck raju wrote:

> I think we need to do away with terms like "cutting edge", "bleeding
> edge" - they are too violent and  appear to be a true characteristic
> of the non-free proprietary world.

I beg to differ. Mainly because:

1. Calling a duck a "duck", and a tiger a "tiger" is the right thing to do.
One can say the leopard was too fast, and the gazelle a wee bit too slow,
it doesn't change events, the aftermath or the eminent emergence.
However, calling the leopard a herbivore is downright silly and stupid.
I say this because there are ways to be open, enable collaboration and
transparent without being free. And, companies and organizations
have exploited this fact.

Just because some people want to call things something else, doesn't
mean the world will change. It just adds up to the confusion and noise.
A majority of people in the world still think "hacking" is bad.

2. Does the world need to change? AFAIK, most promising work on
Kernels and other System Software is happening on Free and
Open technologies. The reason is simple: Openness and easy
accessibility reduces barriers to entry. Besides being excellent, the FOSS
tool-chain is vast. I don't think any single commercial entity, or the even
leading ones combined, can boast of this. Hell, even iPhone apps are
compiled using gcc! If this isn't cutting or bleeding edge I do't know what is.

Of Free, Open, Shared, and  Collaborative - I think Free is the most important.
At least, that is why I am here. Cutting-edge, sharing surface and bleeding
edge, and whatever-else are just side-effects.

3. If Free and Open conjures up images of anarchy and rebellion, well,
then that is what it essentially is. Anything that upsets the established
order, or is inherently revolutionary brings along with it good elements
of violence, conflict and friction. More often than not, it is the established
order that draws first blood.

There isn't a single documented instance of struggle for freedom in 
rights, thoughts or ideas in all of human history devoid of violence
and anarchy. Whether or not you want it, call it what you want, this stuff
happens.

Terms and words are seldom violent, our perceptions always are.

Cheers,

Amol Hatwar
_______________________________________________
network mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in

Reply via email to