On Saturday 06 March 2010 01:03:20 Vickram Crishna wrote: > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 5:54 PM, A. Mani <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:25 PM, sankarshan > > <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Indranil Das Gupta > > > <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > >> A while back Sri Banerji, responded back with his > > >> clarifications. I've put up his response on my blog - > > >> http://indradg.randomink.org/blog/archives/155 > > > > If he is interested, then maybe he can break free from his > > proprietary world. > > Here is an honest hardworking person, who wants to see whether free > software can run on a proprietary system, and solve problems that > exist only in that proprietary system's environment (of course that > was not the brief given to him, but where would we be if everyone > only stuck to their briefs?),
;-). Funny how "THE BRIEF" comes up when a floss consultant brings in very relevant extraneous factors that give floss an advantage. But when it is the other way around one must stick to the clauses of the brief. > and an entire list is laughing at > him. > > For shame! -- Rgds JTD _______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
