On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Sayan "Riju" Chakrabarti < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Narendra Sisodiya < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Narendra Sisodiya < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >>>> +++++++++++ Start ++++++++++++ >>>> *(c) 2010, Narendra Sisodiya, http://narendrasisodiya.com This work is >>>> release under NPDL license. * >>>> >>> > >> Its - Near Public Domain License. > > Thanks for clarifying! /me was beginning to think it meant Narendra's > Personal Development/Documentation License! J.K.! > > >> License never need any approval. You can create your own license too. > License are just terms are condition you provide for "terms and condition" > for using your non-tangible objects like a text or image or content. > > AFAIK, this is indeed correct. So, the question comes up, why form a new > license with a fancy name? We can use a more generic licensing text like > e.g.: > > *"Permissions are hereby granted to any person obtaining a copy of this > licensed content to freely use/resue/modify/distribute the content as he/she > sees fit, provided that the person concerned in turn allows any other person > to freely use/resue/modify/distribute the used/reused/modified/distributed > content in any way seen fit by the latter. > > * > you can write in this way also, but having a standard text and name always better may be something *Permissions are hereby granted to use/reuse this content* in any manner provided you are now allowed to change license term and conditions.* Well I am writing some detailed article on this and will post on CC mailing list.. Thanks
_______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
