On 10/04/11 11:47, Pranesh Prakash wrote:
On Saturday 09 April 2011 04:42 PM, Narendra Sisodiya wrote:
What modification we want ?? website must be compatible to Firefox,
Chrome
etc, Website must not contains FLASH etc, Document must ODF and
Multimedia
must be OGG.
We must add something more like, having a provision to pay via credit
card
or online payment , direct submission of complain via website. So WE
(the
internet savvy) must add our modifications and create a better Web2.0
version of Jan Lokpal Bill.
Could someone, perhaps the OP, please explain to me how any of this is
in the least connected with the carrying out of an ombudsman function?
Or I am just being exceptionally dull in not being able to detect any
link whatsoever?
Well, some times the very obvious is the one which is not so obvious.
While the OP will put his views, I see this as clear as daylite.
If the said bill is connected with a web site then that site aught to
have compatibility with all the open standards, should be browser
independ and all the other points mentioned.
If there are documents which will be downloaded or are associated with
the bill, for example some kind of explaination or some form etc, then
it should be in open standards.
As such we need not go into why open standards are so important and
things like doc or docx thrown out.
This is already nown to the members of this list and so Seeing this as a
public afair, there is no point supporting proprietory stuff.
happy hacking.
Krishnakant.
_______________________________________________
network mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
