On 11 April 2011 10:52, Vickram Crishna <[email protected]> wrote: [SNIP] > certainly, I do not claim any divine ability to draft correctly or > perfectly, but for goodness' sake make your own alternative suggestion > rather than merely finding fault with others'): > 1. The website must be compatible with internationally accepted standards > for openness and accessibility, as endorsed from time to time for use, and > avoid the use of proprietary formats that force users into purchasing or > accepting restrictive proprietary conditions. > > 2. Transaction methods for payments made under the provisions of this Bill > must allow for the widest variety of methods legally enforceable for > commercial transactions available and in use from time to time, including > both physical and virtual transfers. The Rules under this Act must focus on > enabling the highest degree of convenience for persons wishing to take > advantage of the provisions of this Act, and draft Rules must be > transparently available for discussion concurrent with the drafting of the > Bill, in order to ensure its rapid applicability once it passes into law.
Very well put Vickram. But why restrict choice from people on using open or proprietary tools? Let us concentrate on making sure that open tools are compatible for accessing and payment. -- Regards, Sudev Barar Read http://blog.sudev.in for topics ranging from here to there. PS: Replying using bottom post/in-line post makes email conversations whole lot easier for meaningful dialogue. Snip out what is not relevant. Adopt this and spread the message. _______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
