On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Narendra Sisodiya <[email protected]> wrote:
> > infact a good number of guys on the CC community also "STRONGLY dislike" NC. > including RMS > http://moonbase.rydia.net/mental/blog/copyfight/rms-on-creative-commons.html > and ME :-) If people in CC community dislike it they can get teh license removed but it still exists because Content creators like it. > Precisely you said the IMP hurdle on NC. one has consult to lawyer. > See CC-World is (AFAIK) designed by lawyers. It is a Lawyer's viewpoint. It > is not designed by the person who create content. > collect some person who create video tutorials and always want to share the > contents. Ask them to write the licence of distribution. They will surely > write 1 Para licence for which you do not need lawyer !! Please spend some time with content creators and you will realize how much they love the NC clause. Infact this license is very close to how content creators think. Given the fact that 99% of content creators wont let you share the content, this license is a success in making such people share content. Just because you have an opinion things wont work out. Either try to change the mentality of content creators or accept the NC clause. > >> > > video are created out of public money for public cause, every TOM DIC and > HARRY deserved to get it (irrespective of whether he is a individual or from > Academia or a business-man) > > So where is the access restricted? The link I pointed earlier clearly states how Corporates can get access to the content. Just that any RAM RAHIM ROBERT is not allowed to distribute it blindly. regards Vivek -- The hidden harmony is better than the obvious!! _______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
