On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 16:42, Vickram Crishna <[email protected]> wrote:
> Still (for those who may have missed the point) an office network is not a > service to the public at large. And there lies the difference. It might be > a case for the consumer courts, though, and it would be interesting to see > one take it up. > > Vickram, I am not in India, but would there be a "consumer" relationship for this "service"? Especially as the Terms of Service allow MS to do this? For example, I send email via GMail, and Gmail delivers it to you (also in Gmail) with a "This might be a phishing scam". Would that be something I could go to a Consumer Court over? Could you? -- Sanjeev Gupta +65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
_______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
