There are some X-type corporates who create applications and plan to earn a living with the information of Y-type corporates. If ordinary people can live without this application or develop their own alternatives, then to me, that is more important than expending public energy and effort to solve a problem between X and Y corporates.
I don't care about what happens to Y or X here, as to me, there's hardly any useful distinction between them. You feel like doing something so that X-corporates lose out, and Y-corporates gain - doesn't make sense to me, when I think of involving public efforts. I would rather use such efforts for things that could be of help to ordinary people than getting involved in corporate warfare. On 02/09/2014, ck raju <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday, 2 September 2014, Pirate Praveen <[email protected]> > wrote: >> 2014-09-02 10:08 या दिवशी ck raju ने लिहीले : >>> >>> In Malayalam there is a saying "സ്വന്തം സഹോദരന് ചത്താലും വേണ്ടില്ല > നാത്തൂന്റെ >>> കണ്ണീരു് കണ്ടാല് മതി" which roughly translates to "I just want to see > sister >>> in law's tears even at the cost of your brother's death". (I agree there >>> is a gender bias in the statement, but I guess you get the point, even >>> if it hurt us we are happy to see tears of our enemy). >>> >>> Are we so stupid to give up our freedoms of it means some powerful or >>> famous or bad people will also lose them (it is a different matter >>> altogether than the whole system works for them and its always the >>> common man that takes hit by these laws)? >>> =========== >>> >>> This is not a correct analogy. A corporate is never related to me. >> >> The analogy was not about relation, but about not liking someone. You > concern that our efforts to secure privacy will also help corporates > matches that analogy. > > Can you quote where I mention this? > > -- > CK Raju > -- CK Raju _______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
