> Well, if the mac layer knows the name, then sure. Right now it takes > the mip->mi_name. If the link name is somewhere in the mac handle, then > there should be no reason why it couldn't be reported instead.
Cathy would know best, but I believe in the present Clearview UV code, the link ID associated with each mac is stored in the mac_impl_t, and can be mapped to its current link name through a door upcall. So yes, it should be possible to report it and would be a nice side benefit of centralizing the implementation. -- meem _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
