Materials for "PSARC/2004/571 Nemo - a.k.a. GLD v3" demonstrate remarkable levels of thoroughness in specifying so many interfaces, but ironically does not seem to include an interface table or a clear statement of the stability classification. Presence of two contracts allows me to guess that they are Contracted Consolidation Private. I also find that a followup case "PSARC/2006/249 Nemo Changes for Binary Compatibility" lists these as Consolidation Private. Sowmini tells me all consumers that initially required contracts are now in ON and contracts are not needed anymore, so CP they are.
Anything I said is incorrect? -Artem _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
