Nicolas Williams writes: > So the bottom-line question then is: Is it OK for a project to regress > upgrade performance by 1.5 minutes?
I don't know that anyone checks this, so perhaps it's something you can get away with, but I don't think I'd personally make such a change _knowingly_. But if your argument is that upgrade is so slow that nobody's going to notice, that's probably true. The only point where it'd get bad is if incremental package adds that use i.services got very slow. I'm assuming that doesn't happen, because there's only one package with the full set of IANA services. > John Levon objected (on IRC) (mildly?) to any scheme involving > postrun-type services as I was considering something like that. Lubomir > Sedlacik (salo), also on IRC, claimed that i.services breaks zone > installation, though salo gave no details on that. That'd be interesting, as /etc is private to the zone and should always be writable. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
