On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 03:29:54PM -0400, James Carlson wrote: > Nicolas Williams writes: > > So the bottom-line question then is: Is it OK for a project to regress > > upgrade performance by 1.5 minutes? > > I don't know that anyone checks this, so perhaps it's something you > can get away with, but I don't think I'd personally make such a change > _knowingly_. > > But if your argument is that upgrade is so slow that nobody's going to > notice, that's probably true.
Upgrade is relatively fast at least in a domU. This would be a significant percentage. Besides any argument based on "upgrades" is wilfully ignoring Indiana. I'd rather not have IANA services, if it comes down to that choice. regards john _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
