Dan McDonald writes: > > 8852: seems a little weak; how can you assume this? > > It does seem weak, no? Fixed. The IPPROTO_ROUTING case is extra annoying, > but also contorts appropriately now.
The same comment is still at line 8840 ... I don't think it applies anymore. In fact, given the code at lines 8855-8867, it's unclear if this code does anything. For lines 8856 and 8862, does this code compile? If it does, then that's surprising. -= and += shouldn't work when both terms are pointers. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[email protected]> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
