> > > > but the rest of it is so stale that > > > > it's probably more harm than good. > > > > > > Indeed. It makes it looks like we're still working on this, and > > > we're not. > > > > Right. > > But how does marking the thing as "completed", "abandoned", "old, status > unknown", whatever, not suffice to avoid the "it makes it looks like > we're still working on this" problem? Why is it so important to delete > any of this?
I don't think it's critically important, but given the speed of Solaris development, abandoned things are highly unlikely to have any reusable parts and may in fact have a lot of guidance that made sense in e.g. 2006 but now would just be toxic to someone trying to pick up the pieces. -- meem _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
