On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 01:54:49PM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > >Garrett seems quite opposed. You also don't seem to agree with > >removal. That leaves me either fighting an uphill battle for no > >apparent reason, or just returning to more useful work. > > > > I'm opposed to deleting the last reference to useful data! And I'm > opposed to deleting an "index" to that data that might be an easier way > to find it. ARC logs work well for those familiar with ARC, but for > many in the community it isn't the first place they'll look.
I don't see the need to delete anything. Mark it as "completed" or "abandoned", or whatever, but don't delete it. There has to be a good reason to delete it. I don't like having to rely on web caches for archeology. Nico -- _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
