On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 05:35:34PM -0400, James Carlson wrote: > Nicolas Williams writes: > > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 05:17:39PM -0400, James Carlson wrote: > > > If you're not intimately involved in networking, and you try to look > > > at or search through our pages, all you'll see is a hodge-podge of > > > mostly useless old junk. Why should it be like that? I feel like I'm > > > stuck in an apartment with floor to ceiling stacks of old newspapers. > > > > I'm not arguing for leaving those pages as they are. I'm arguing for > > not deleting them but instead marking as old/obsolete/whatever (and move > > them into an archive area). > > > > Perhaps we need something like archive.opensolaris.org where all old > > pages go to die. > > Which is, given the current activity in the web site transition > project, and the request I've cited more than once for having things > _removed_, seems pretty much like a vote for "do nothing."
Yeah, I get that as far as archive.opensolaris.org goes, but why can't we just edit these pages to put a big warning at the top? ETOOHARD? _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
