On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 10:54 +0200, Thomas Haller wrote: > On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 17:36 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 00:01 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > Am 17.06.2014 19:54, schrieb Dan Winship: > > > > On 06/17/2014 10:50 AM, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > >> Looking through the changes in configure.ac, I notice that libteam is a > > > >> new (optional) dependency. > > > >> Which of the new functionality depends on libteam? > > > > > > > > "team" devices. (The new half-kernel/half-userland replacement for the > > > > "bond" driver.) > > > > > > That's where my question was aiming at: does the bonding support in NM > > > require libteam/teamd or does it also work with kernel-style bonding? > > > > Bond and Team are separate device types in NetworkManager, and they can > > be used independently of each other. Using the old-style kernel bond > > devices does not require Team functionality to be enabled. > > > > Btw. would be nice to make team-devices a plugin too. > > > For example on Fedora and RHEL we build with > "BuildRequires: teamd-devel" > thus all NetworkManager packages depends on teamd package. > > I will craft a branch for that...
Yeah, great idea. Dan _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
