On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 12:03 PM Steve Hill <st...@opendium.com> wrote: > > On 16/06/2021 09:43, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > > > It is explicitly prohibited to assign any IA_PD prefix to the same > > interface via which this was obtained. > > > > the requesting router MUST > > NOT assign any delegated prefixes or subnets from the delegated > > prefix(es) to the link through which it received the DHCP message > > from the delegating router. > > [...Which is from RFC 3633] > > That's a pain. It basically makes it impossible for a single-NIC > machine to connect to an ISP that is only responding to IA_PD. (Well, > you can obviously set up a dummy NIC, which can be assigned a prefix, > but that's a kludge). > > I can see why you wouldn't want a whole /64 to be assigned to an > ethernet interface that received the DHCPv6 Advertise, but it does feel > reasonable to be able to *optionally* assign a /128 to the > point-to-point link that received the DHCPv6 Advertise, if there is no > other way to assign a global address to it. >
The default and standard method to assign IPv6 address is SLAAC. DHCPv6 is optional. You need to investigate why SLAAC address was not assigned. _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
