On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 1:37 PM
>
>
> > On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> >
> > > is a noop function. Any need to keep it?
> >
> > Yes. backwards compatability with old modules that used to call it.
>
> Why on earth can't it be a no-op'ed macro? It's not like the module
> can ever be a dynamic module linking to both the apache-1.3 and httpd-2.0
> libraries.
It'd be fine as a macro, but it has to be there somewhere.
Ryan
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
