On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, dean gaudet wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >
> > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 1:37 PM
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > is a noop function. Any need to keep it?
> > > >
> > > > Yes. backwards compatability with old modules that used to call it.
> > >
> > > Why on earth can't it be a no-op'ed macro? It's not like the module
> > > can ever be a dynamic module linking to both the apache-1.3 and httpd-2.0
> > > libraries.
> >
> > It'd be fine as a macro, but it has to be there somewhere.
>
> why does it have to be there somewhere? are you guys maintaining
> source compatibility between 1.3 and 2.0?
Unfortunately, we are trying to. It makes no sense, because we have
already broken source compatability so many times, but this was a
requirement when we did the filtering stuff.
Ryan
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
