[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, dean gaudet wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 27 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 1:37 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > is a noop function. Any need to keep it?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes. backwards compatability with old modules that used to call it.
> > > >
> > > > Why on earth can't it be a no-op'ed macro? It's not like the module
> > > > can ever be a dynamic module linking to both the apache-1.3 and httpd-2.0
> > > > libraries.
> > >
> > > It'd be fine as a macro, but it has to be there somewhere.
> >
> > why does it have to be there somewhere? are you guys maintaining
> > source compatibility between 1.3 and 2.0?
>
> Unfortunately, we are trying to. It makes no sense, because we have
> already broken source compatability so many times, but this was a
> requirement when we did the filtering stuff.
Feh.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
ApacheCon 2001! http://ApacheCon.com/
