On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 11:24:20AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >... > bunch of code so that more people can work on it. Explain to me how it > makes sense to put the DocumentRoot directive in the HTTP module. I Actually, I think DocumentRoot *is* HTTP specific :-) SMTP, POP, SNMP, and NNTP wouldn't use it. I could see FTP using it, but I probably would have used a different name anyway. It's good work. It should be done. But I think some of your shifts are questionable :-) Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.... Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server c... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/ser... Greg Stein
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0... Roy T. Fielding
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/ser... Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0... Bill Stoddard
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0... Greg Stein
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0... Roy T. Fielding
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.... Greg Stein
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server c... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server c... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/ser... David Reid
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/ser... Greg Stein
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server c... David Reid
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c Makefile.in... William A. Rowe, Jr.
