> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Assuming that you do not, I plan on continuing to work on > > this, because it is what I care about right now. > > Well, it *does* ought to be done.. *shrug* I personally > do not have any investment in when we go beta, so AFAIC > this should stay in and the beta can just wait until > everything is stable and people are comfortable. > -- It's in so leave it in. But I think Ken does bring up a valid point. Jeff and I spend a good bit of our development time fixing compile breaks, many which are introduced by 'cosmetic' changes to the code or build environment. In general, folks have been MUCH less disciplined about what they commit to Apache 2.0 than what they commit to 1.3. It's time for that to change. I would request that you (all of us) try to compile our commits against multiple OSes as a courtesy to the other active developers. Bill
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c Makefile.in... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c Makefi... Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c Ma... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.... Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server c... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/ser... Greg Stein
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0... Roy T. Fielding
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/ser... Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0... Bill Stoddard
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0... Greg Stein
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0... Roy T. Fielding
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.... Greg Stein
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server c... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server c... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/ser... David Reid
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/ser... Greg Stein
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server c... David Reid
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c Makefile.in... William A. Rowe, Jr.
