> It's good work. It should be done. But I think some of your shifts are > questionable :-) So far Ryan's been quite good at supporting/debating/conceding his moves, so I've got no problem with his approach. If it's wrong it can be fixed but at least it does throw up the issue! david
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/ser... Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0... Bill Stoddard
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0... Greg Stein
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0... Roy T. Fielding
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.... Greg Stein
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server c... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server c... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/ser... David Reid
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/ser... Greg Stein
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server c... David Reid
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c Makefile.in... William A. Rowe, Jr.
