David Reid wrote:
>
> Have we agreed that the multi-protocol stuff that was outlined (and this
> patch is based on) is the correct way to go? I'm not convinced that it is.
> I REALLY dislike the fact that we appear to be pulling in 2 directions at
> the moment.
>
> One group is trying to get 2.0 bug fixed and ready for release, the other
> trying to destabilize it and insert new potential for bugs and holes!! If
> the multi-protocol stuff is a *MUST* have for a 2.0 release then we should
> have some real discussions and stop worrying about rolling "beta's".
>
> If it's not a must have then perhaps we should stop worrying about this and
> make it an issue for 2.1? Sorry to be blunt.
David, I know some people (ISPs) who do around 6 months of
installation testing before they make somethings operational.
These are mostly done for core network features, but also
for every service they use.
I don't think they would mind to wait a month if they get
what they want in 2.0. The mind earlier doing the operational
testing twice.
Harrie
--
phone: +39-3474932300
http://www.lisanza.net/
