On Tuesday, April 17, 2001, at 05:21 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 02:17:00PM -0400, Chuck Murcko wrote:
>
> Hmm. But we can only go hog-wild on a 2.1 with new features if it is
> separate from the 2.0 development (where we want to bugfix). That means
> two
> trees (whether that is two CVS repositories, or one rep with two
> branches).
> Bugger on maintenance since we will probably tweak 1.3 for a while, too.
>
> I'm not sure what the right approach is, but it would be good to start
> the
> list in the STATUS file, methinks.
>
Yeah. 2.0 still has to stabilize & perform enough to do a branch for
maintenance, and continue development on the HEAD.
Using STATUS to get started is +1 optimal right now.
>> ...
>> And I know that multiprotocol support has been on the list for 2.0
>> for a
>> little while now. We still have to talk about removing the proxy: hack.
>
> A "little while" ?? Heh. mod_echo was first checked in on August 23,
> 1999.
>
8^)
Chuck Murcko
Topsail Group
http://www.topsail.org/
