Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> my only concen with splitting the proxy out is that
> no one will actively maintain it, and keep it up to date
> with the current http releases.
>
> saying that i'm quite happy to volunteer myself to do this function,
> but i'm not an ASF member, or even have commit access for that
> matter.
Don't let that keep you from working on proxy (or anything else for
that matter), whether or not proxy stays out of the main CVS :) Also,
note that the additional empowerment is not so hard to get.
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Graham Leggett
- Build system that could integra... Sean Chittenden
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Graham Leggett
- RE: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Ian Holsman
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Jim Jagielski
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chuck Murcko
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Iain Brown
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Eli Marmor
- RE: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Ian Holsman
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chuck Murcko
- proxy maintenance (was: Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in?... Jeff Trawick
- proxy maintenance (was: Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in?... Greg Stein
- Re: proxy maintenance (was: Re: [VOTE] mod_p... Graham Leggett
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Graham Leggett
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chuck Murcko
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chuck Murcko
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Theo Schlossnagle
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Victor J. Orlikowski
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Sander van Zoest
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chris Pepper
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chuck Murcko
