Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 1. I forget... is mod_proxy it's own project (ala apr?) If not,
> it should be.
Keep one thing in mind though - splitting out modules into more and more
sub projects means more and more work for the end user, both for
compiling the server, and for installing it.
Regards,
Graham
--
-----------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "There's a moon
over Bourbon Street
tonight..."
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Jim Jagielski
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chuck Murcko
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chuck Murcko
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Greg Stein
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chuck Murcko
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Bill Stoddard
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Graham Leggett
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Jim Jagielski
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? rbb
- Build system that could integrate su... Graham Leggett
- Build system that could integra... Sean Chittenden
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Graham Leggett
- RE: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Ian Holsman
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Jim Jagielski
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chuck Murcko
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Iain Brown
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Eli Marmor
- RE: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Ian Holsman
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chuck Murcko
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Jeff Trawick
