> > I agree that this module has been abandoned, but I would > > I disagree that it is "abandoned." We all have time here and there to work > on things. That means some work time, and some idle time. Who says that > nobody is working on it? Who says that nobody is ready to step up to the > plate and work on it? It is premature to call it abandoned. The only reason I called it abandoned, is that nobody has worked on since it was first committed. Other than that one point of clarification, I agree 100% with everything you said. Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: [martin: Cron <martin@deejai2> CRO... jean-frederic clere
- Re: [martin: Cron <martin@deejai2>... jean-frederic clere
- Re: [martin: Cron <martin@deejai2... Greg Stein
- Re: [martin: Cron <martin@de... jean-frederic clere
- Re: [martin: Cron <marti... jean-frederic clere
- Re: [martin: Cron <marti... Martin Kraemer
- Re: [martin: Cron <martin@deejai2> CRO... Martin Kraemer
- Re: [martin: Cron <martin@deejai2> CRONJOBS/htt... rbb
- Re: [martin: Cron <martin@deejai2> CRONJOB... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- SSL stuff (was: Re: [martin: Cron <martin@dee... Greg Stein
- Re: SSL stuff rbb
- Re: SSL stuff Martin Kraemer
- Re: SSL stuff Roy T. Fielding
- Re: SSL stuff Martin Kraemer
- Re: SSL stuff Jim Jagielski
- Re: SSL stuff Martin Kraemer
- Re: SSL stuff Jim Jagielski
- Re: SSL stuff Greg Stein
- Re: SSL stuff Jim Jagielski
- Re: SSL stuff Ben Laurie
- Re: [martin: Cron <martin@deejai2> CRONJOB... Bill Stoddard
