On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 09:22:51AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Martin Kraemer wrote:
> >
> > AFAIK Ralf is working on a mod_ssl port to apache-2.0. And I noticed
> > there is already a modules/ssl/ subdirectory present in CVS.
> > Does that mean that Ralf is free to add mod_ssl in parallel to mod_tls,
> > so that apache-2.0 users will have the choice between the "small but
> > sufficient" and the "bigger but professional" SSL solution?
> >
>
> Here's my take on things... First of all, I don't think the
> httpd-2.0 CVS tree should be a place where people "drop"
> code into to "stake a claim". If mod_tls and mod_ssl and mod_whatever
> will be officially folded into and maintained in the CVS tree,
> similar to what's being done with mod_proxy, mod_dav, etc. than
> I'm up for as many implementations included as there are
> people supporting it.
++1. Fully agreed. (In a private talk, I think Ralf got the
impression that his solution was unwanted by the other members.
That is why I wanted to bring this up for discussion).
> I don't think we (the ASF) should take
> any sort of position is which is the better choice, or
> even make editorial statements regarding the various solutions
> though :)
Blush... Sorry, you are right, of course.
Martin
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Fujitsu Siemens
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | 81730 Munich, Germany
