Martin Kraemer wrote:
>
> AFAIK Ralf is working on a mod_ssl port to apache-2.0. And I noticed
> there is already a modules/ssl/ subdirectory present in CVS.
> Does that mean that Ralf is free to add mod_ssl in parallel to mod_tls,
> so that apache-2.0 users will have the choice between the "small but
> sufficient" and the "bigger but professional" SSL solution?
>
Here's my take on things... First of all, I don't think the
httpd-2.0 CVS tree should be a place where people "drop"
code into to "stake a claim". If mod_tls and mod_ssl and mod_whatever
will be officially folded into and maintained in the CVS tree,
similar to what's being done with mod_proxy, mod_dav, etc. than
I'm up for as many implementations included as there are
people supporting it. I don't think we (the ASF) should take
any sort of position is which is the better choice, or
even make editorial statements regarding the various solutions
though :)
--
===========================================================================
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody."
