On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Greg Ames wrote:
> includes have been totally broken since April 29. My patch fixes
> includes, so I believe this patch qualifies as making progress toward
> a usable server.
I don't have a problem with this as a stopgap measure, though I think it
should get replaced with the setaside stuff ASAP.
> recreating the apr_blah_t structures. Shouldn't we be optimizing for
> the common cases rather than the basket cases?
;-)
> How huge are 20 apr_mmap_t's? Big deal if they have to wait for the end
> of the request. and how common would it be to have 20 include files
> anyway?
Yeah, but there're other problems, like chewing up too many file handles
in pathological cases...
> Let's see some real world examples where this is noticeably bad.
What about mod_autoindex on a directory with 1000 files?
--Cliff
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
