I was wondering if mod_autoindex should be using subrequests at all.

Wouldn't it be better if there was a optional function that both
mod_mime & mod_mime_magic exported which could provide the mime
type of a file (which is what mod_autoindex needs the subrequest for)

..Ian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Ames [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 7:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES
> 
> 
> Cliff Woolley wrote:
> > 
> 
> > 
> > > How huge are 20 apr_mmap_t's?  Big deal if they have to 
> wait for the end
> > > of the request.  and how common would it be to have 20 
> include files
> > > anyway?
> > 
> > Yeah, but there're other problems, like chewing up too many 
> file handles
> > in pathological cases...
> > 
> > > Let's see some real world examples where this is noticeably bad.
> > 
> > What about mod_autoindex on a directory with 1000 files?
> 
> <gulp>  If the little icons on each line turn into subrequests, you've
> got me, for sure.  
> 
> I don't think many admins would intentionally turn on autoindexing on
> such a directory - imagine navigating thru this puppy with 
> your favorite
> browser.  But if they did, I'm sure that they would rather see output
> than seg faults.
> 
> As I think I said, I don't mind a superior solution.  But the 
> last time
> I checked, it didn't exist.  Seg faults in the core whenever you use
> something as popular as mod_include just don't cut it.
> 
> Greg
> 

Reply via email to