"Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree with both Greg Ames and Ryan. I would like to keep this fix in for now,
>even
> though it is not perfect. It is certainly not nearly as bad as using c->pool. When
>the
> setaside pool is ready, take it out. This keeps us working and able to debug other
> problems in mod_include untill then. We may even be able to roll
> 2.0.19 late this week.
I'd like to see it stay in until we get the setaside working. It is
as easy as can be to back out when the time comes.
(cool... my e-mail works again!)
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES Bill Stoddard
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES Greg Ames
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES Cliff Woolley
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES Greg Ames
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES Bill Stoddard
- RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES Jeff Trawick
- RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES Ian Holsman
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES Victor J. Orlikowski
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES Ryan Bloom
