Re: Extraneous socket read?

[dean gaudet]

On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, dean gaudet wrote:

> (aie! is get{sock,peer}name really so expensive / used so much that
> you need to keep userland copies??  that means you're paying for it
> twice!  once in the kernel, once in userland!)

haha, *three* times!  the third is in conn_rec :)

-dean