Re: Extraneous socket read?

[rbb]

On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, dean gaudet wrote:

> On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, dean gaudet wrote:
>
> > (aie! is get{sock,peer}name really so expensive / used so much that
> > you need to keep userland copies??  that means you're paying for it
> > twice!  once in the kernel, once in userland!)
>
> haha, *three* times!  the third is in conn_rec :)

damn, that one in the conn_rec should have gone away a LONG time ago.  I
won't comment on the other userland copy.

Ryan

_____________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom                              [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Covalent Technologies                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------