well having one of those two userland copies is OK i guess (there are many
references to it within apache)... it's just unfortunate that the
apr_socket_t is so heavy-weight -- the request_rec/conn_rec is already
heavy-weight for so many other reasons that it's no worry being there.
-dean
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, dean gaudet wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, dean gaudet wrote:
> >
> > > (aie! is get{sock,peer}name really so expensive / used so much that
> > > you need to keep userland copies?? that means you're paying for it
> > > twice! once in the kernel, once in userland!)
> >
> > haha, *three* times! the third is in conn_rec :)
>
> damn, that one in the conn_rec should have gone away a LONG time ago. I
> won't comment on the other userland copy.
>
> Ryan
>
> _____________________________________________________________________________
> Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
