On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 01:18:04PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 12:49:51PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote: > > Doesn't pthread_mutex_acquire sit in sem_wait() or sigwait()? That'll > > let it be cancel()ed. > > Nope. > > As I posted earlier, man cancellation on Solaris 8 says: > > A mutex is explicitly not a cancellation point and should > be held for only the minimal essential time. Hmmm..that sounds like we're using mutexes incorrectly. -aaron
- Re: Terminiting threads in a process R... dean gaudet
- Re: Terminiting threads in a process RE: [... Justin Erenkrantz
- RE: Terminating threads in a process, ... Sander Striker
- Re: Terminating threads in a process, ... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: Terminiting threads in a process R... Aaron Bannert
- Re: Terminiting threads in a process R... rbb
- Re: Terminiting threads in a process R... Aaron Bannert
- Re: Terminiting threads in a process R... rbb
- Standards compliance in Apache code WA... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: Terminiting threads in a process R... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: Terminiting threads in a process R... Aaron Bannert
- Re: Terminiting threads in a process R... rbb
- Re: Terminiting threads in a process R... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: Terminiting threads in a process R... rbb
- [PATCH] Add intraprocess mutex to thre... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: Terminiting threads in a process R... Aaron Bannert
- Re: Terminiting threads in a process R... rbb
- Re: [PATCH] Problems with MPM threaded dean gaudet
- RE: [PATCH] Problems with MPM threaded Benjamin W. Ritcey
- Re[2]: [PATCH] Problems with MPM threaded Jeff Stuart
- Why I think we need a SPMT model was Re: [PATC... Justin Erenkrantz
