On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 01:29:35PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > What you are missing is the history.  All of the problems that we are
> > trying to solve were solved already in the original code.  These problem
> > are solved most easily by using two mutexes, one for keeping only one
> > process in the inner loop, and the inner one for the threads in the
> > process.  Then, when you are killing a process, you can easily wake up all
> > the threads in the process that are sitting on a lock.
>
> Ah.  Yes, that makes more sense.  But, that's not what's there now.
>
> Shall I submit a patch to threaded MPM to do this?  -- justin

Please.

Ryan

_____________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom                              [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Covalent Technologies                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to